All Articles

Click a category to see articles

🚨DISINFORMATION: “RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA HOAX CAN’T BE CHARGED” = FALSE/LIE🚨

🚨DISINFORMATION: “RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA HOAX CAN’T BE CHARGED” = FALSE/LIE🚨

By:  ALPHAWARRIOR @xAlphaWarriorx 

To anyone and everyone claiming charges can’t be brought against the architects of the Russia Hoax - you are either misinformed or deliberately misleading.

That argument collapses the moment you understand conspiracy law and the legal framework of an ongoing criminal enterprise.

The “Russia, Russia, Russia hoax” is not an isolated crime. It is part of a massive, coordinated conspiracy, one that spans years, agencies, elections, and media platforms. It is the opening chapter of the largest RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) investigation in U.S. history, encompassing seditious conspiracy, espionage, treason, obstruction, perjury, FISA abuse, election interference, blackmail and more, both past and future. Learn “Continuing Conspiracy Doctrine”.

If you doubt this, study the Continuing Conspiracy Doctrine. Look up:

-U.S. v. Grunewald (1957)

-U.S. v. Salameh (2002, RICO)

-U.S. v. Dynalectric Co. (2007)

🔑 Key point:

Conspiracy charges have no statute of limitations if the criminal enterprise is ongoing, and when crimes are continuously committed as part of that conspiracy, the timeline resets. Every cover-up. Every lie under oath. Every compromised official still in office. It all counts.

That “Comey 8647” hits a little harder now, doesn’t it?

UNDERSTAND THE STATUTES:

-18 U.S. Code § 2384 – Seditious Conspiracy

Legal Elements:

Two or more persons conspire to overthrow, put down, or destroy by force the U.S. government, or to oppose by force its authority, or to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States.

Application to Russia Hoax:

While “force” is a required element, courts have interpreted this to include “concerted efforts to subvert lawful government functions” in certain cases when paired with other felonious acts. If government officials used DOJ, FBI, and intelligence assets to sabotage a sitting President through fraudulent means—knowingly abusing FISA courts, leaking classified info, and interfering with the execution of Article II powers—this could constitute an unlawful conspiracy to delay or obstruct government functions.

✅ Legally sound as a plausible argument, especially when paired with obstruction, FISA abuse, and RICO conspiracy. The “force” threshold would be the most contested and would require proving institutional power was weaponized maliciously.

-18 U.S. Code § 2381 – Treason

Legal Elements:

Levying war against the United States or giving aid and comfort to its enemies.

Application to Russia Hoax:

If evidence surfaces that actors knowingly collaborated with or used foreign intelligence (e.g., UK MI6, Ukrainian sources, or other foreign adversaries) to sabotage an American president and deceive the U.S. public and institutions, it could rise to treason. The "aid and comfort" standard could apply if hostile foreign entities were knowingly assisted in destabilizing U.S. governance.

✅ Possible but harder to prove. Stronger if future declassified material shows collusion with hostile foreign actors or foreign countries that assisted in direct harm to US National Security would make them hostile actors if not currently identified as one. (Ukraine, Serbia, Five Eyes etc)

-18 U.S. Code § 793 – Espionage Act

Legal Elements:

Unauthorized possession, communication, or retention of national defense information with reason to believe it could harm the U.S. or benefit a foreign nation.

Application to Russia Hoax:

Leaks of classified FISA applications, intelligence reports, or defense-related materials, intended to damage a sitting President and influence an election, fall squarely under this law. If any actor unlawfully stored, transmitted, or altered this information for political purposes or to benefit foreign allies/entities, they would be criminally liable.

✅ Legally sound, especially when applied to intelligence community leakers and handlers. The act has been used repeatedly in prior leak prosecutions and would be further strengthened if classified information was used deceptively in FISA applications or election interference.

-18 U.S. Code § 1961 – RICO Statutes

Legal Elements:

Requires a “pattern of racketeering activity” (2+ predicate acts within 10 years) tied to an ongoing criminal enterprise.

Application to Russia Hoax:

The Russia Hoax represents a textbook RICO case when viewed through the lens of multiple, coordinated felonies: FISA fraud, perjury to federal courts, obstruction of justice, classified leaks, election interference, and conspiracy to defraud the U.S. all committed by actors within agencies, media, and legal structures over a multi-year span.

✅ Extremely legally sound. RICO allows prosecutors to tie together seemingly separate crimes across agencies and time periods under one charge, provided the enterprise is continuing. This is the most strategic and encompassing charge available.

-18 U.S. Code § 371 – Conspiracy to Defraud the United States

Legal Elements:

Two or more persons conspire to defraud the U.S. by interfering with or obstructing lawful functions of the government.

Application to Russia Hoax:

False FISA applications, suppression of exculpatory evidence, leaking disinformation to media outlets, and obstructing legitimate oversight or investigations into the matter all qualify. This statute is routinely used when individuals conspire to disrupt federal processes, deceive agencies, or interfere in elections under false pretenses.

✅ Legally rock-solid. One of the most frequently used statutes in federal conspiracy cases, and perfectly fits coordinated institutional deceit and obstruction, especially when layered with perjury and ongoing election interference.

Each statute is still in play. Each applies if the conspiracy remains active or its effects are ongoing.

🔥 What did the Director of National Intelligence (DNI) Tulsi Gabbard publicly post on July 18th 2025 2:10pm EST re: Russia Hoax:

"These documents detail a treasonous conspiracy by officials at the highest levels of the Obama White House to subvert the will of the American people and try to usurp the President from fulfilling his mandate."

Let that sink in.

Ask Yourself:

-Why are there over 450,000 sealed indictments?

-Why did so many establishment operatives panic at the idea of Trump returning?

-Why are they still trying to sabotage his second term?

Because they know:

👉 The real investigation didn’t stop, it went covert/classified. FISA works both ways...

👉 The fake investigations were the distraction/cover up.

👉 The real one is methodical. Strategic. Relentless. Still unfolding and Legal! It is RICO.

Don’t Let Influencers Deceive to You:

They’ve never signed a warrant.

They’ve never built a case.

They’ve never sworn an affidavit.

They've never handled an informant.

They've never handled witness protection.

They've never handled crime families, crime enterprises, international crime syndicates, mafia's or cartel investigations.

But they’ll tell you “nothing can be done.”

Wrong. Everything can be done - when you understand the law, the scale, and the timing.

Let’s Talk About Epstein.

Let’s talk about how the SAME players who ran the Russia Hoax also protected Jeffrey Epstein:

🚨 EPSTEIN’S 2008–2009 NPA (Non-Prosecution Agreement):

Reminder, who were the players during the time of Epstein‘s non-prosecution agreement (NPA). That’s right Robert Mueller was the FBI director, Michael Mukasey was a US Attorney General under Bush, Alex Acosta was the US attorney for Southern District of Florida. DOJ criminal division head at the time, Alice Fisher, a bush appointee that had Clinton ties. Eric Holder became the Attorney General in February 2009 through 2015 and Barack Obama became president in January 2009.

🚨 Between 2011–2016:

Between 2011 and 2016, there was still growing evidence and no arrest. Epstein continued flying, trafficking, abusing and violating probation from 2010 to 2016. Epstein even entered plea, violation territory with travel restrictions on international flights, never registered as a sex offender in multiple states and was still hosting high profile figures on his private island and jets.

No DOJ or FBI action was taken to arrest Epstein, despite multiple documented probation violations.

Key officials during this time:

-FBI Director: Robert Mueller (until 2013), James Comey (2013–2017)

-Deputy FBI Director: Andrew McCabe

-AGs: Eric Holder → Loretta Lynch

-President: Barack Obama

🚨 2016: The WEINER Laptop

Then there was the 2016 Anthony Weiner‘s laptop seized in a child porn investigation. The NYPD during the investigation into Weiner’s laptop reported emails related to Hillary Clinton’s private server (via Huma Abedin, Weiner’s wife and Clinton aide) were discovered. James Comey, the FBI director, reopened the Clinton investigation on October 28, 2016. On November 6, 2016, just two days before the election, Comey announced the case was closed again, stating the review of the emails had found no new evidence to change the previous conclusion.

Whistleblowers, including NYPD sources, claimed disturbing material was found, suppressed by federal agencies.

Who was involved?

James Comey, FBI Director. Andrew McCabe, Deputy FBI Director. Loretta Lynch, AG and Peter stroke and Lisa page (involved in reviewing laptop, contents).

🚨 Clinton-Epstein Connection:

Bill Clinton flew at least 26 times on Epstein‘s jet documented by flight logs between 2001 and 2003. Despite that, no action, no investigation, no subpoenas were issued by the FBI under Mueller or Comey. Virginia Giuffre and other victims identified Clinton as a person of interest on Epsteins Island in testimony. The FBI had flight logs, witness statements, sealed affidavits, yet the case was dormant until 2019.

All under Mueller and Comey.

🚨 Ghislaine Maxwell:

Ghislaine Maxwell was unindicted from 2008 to 2020. Maxwell was named repeatedly in 2008 by victims and civil suits and was never charged. It wasn't until July 2, 2020 by the Southern District of New York (SDNY) on federal charges including enticement of minors, sex trafficking, and perjury that Maxwell was charged.

This arrest occurred under Attorney General Bill Barr, who had been appointed by President Donald Trump.

Importantly, DOJ prosecutors under Barr also began revisiting the Epstein case following Epstein’s arrest in July 2019, which re-opened scrutiny on co-conspirators like Maxwell.

Why not under Mueller? Comey? Holder? Lynch?

Because Maxwell was central to the operation.

Charging her meant unraveling the network, including Obama-era intel and diplomatic officials.

Here’s the Bottom Line:

There is clear factual evidence that the key players who led the Russia hoax also ran the agencies that protected Epstein. Mueller oversaw the FBI during Epstein's sweetheart deal. Comey ignored Epstein violations and buried the Weiner laptop information. Holder and Lynch failed to act on Epstein‘s violations, concealed evidence and ran interference for elite potential co-conspirators. And the Obama administration used DOJ and Intel networks to suppress all high profile Epstein connections.

Epstein was only arrested again under President Trump’s DOJ in 2019 and then "allegedly" committed suicide mysteriously just weeks later.

So let me put a bow on this for everyone. Epstein was and is a Rico case. Jeffrey Epstein wasn’t just a pedophile, he was running a blackmail operation protected by the DOJ/FBI intelligence agencies (I suspect foreign agencies as well) for over a decade.

That’s not a scandal. That’s a criminal enterprise. Mueller, Comey, Holder and Lynch all had the power to stop them and they didn’t. That’s Rico. And the only reason he got arrested. Trump‘s DOJ.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Semper Fi

-ALPHA

Keep digging into Epstein. Keep supporting your President. Keep watching for the indictments. It’s not over. Obama is just beginning.

Write comment (0 Comments)
Is President Trump Being Dismissive or Cavalier re: Epstein?

Is President Trump Being Dismissive or Cavalier re: Epstein?

By: David Limbaugh @DavidLimbaugh X Formerly Twitter

 Many think Trump is being dismissive of the Epstein thing -- cavalier. I don't read it that way. I think he's pissed. He has racked up amazing, unprecedented policy accomplishments and Epstein is sucking the wind out of it -- not to just to his detriment, but ultimately to ours.

I think we're being presented with a false choice: you either favor full disclosure no matter the law and consequences about which we have no knowledge, or you're a pedi-protector.

Do you all really believe Kash Patel and Dan Bongino, let alone Pam Bondi despite her PR missteps, have something to hide here? Is it conceivable that Patel and Bongino have railed about this issue for some time and now have some nefarious motive in changing their position? Did they find out -- unbeknownst to themselves -- that they are on the list?

Could there be some plausible explanation as to why they are playing their cards close to the vest for the time being, or is the fact that they're doing so proof that they are suddenly embroiled in corruption?

That is not plausible to me. I don't think these people changed their stripes that quickly. And I don't think my willingness to trust them -- makes me an enabler of corruption or perversion.

Back to Trump. If he were implicated the Dems would have crucified him when they had sole possession of the materials -- files, list or no list. You know it. I know it.

But now people who have doggedly supported him even through tougher times are turning on him and piling on with the opportunistic Democrats who heretofore haven't given two shakes about any of this.

None of us knows the full story yet. None of us knows yet why the administration hasn't done a better job explaining at least that they'll be able to tell us more later.

But it seems many have so much invested in believing the worst about this -- that Epstein was the leader or at the center of a Robert Ludlum-level international conspiracy -- that they can't let it go. It's as if their worldview will crumble if their worst suspicions aren't vindicated. And if Trump and his administration happen to be in office when this whole thing fizzles, then they too must have been nefariously drawn into this conspiracy that is too powerful even for the fiercest of otherwise moral mortals.

In the meantime, Trump's heyday is being rained on and he feels betrayed by a bunch of supporters who in turn feel that he's betrayed them.

Well, I'm just asking for a little grace on both sides, especially the supporters who should at least give Trump, Bongino, Patel, and even Bondi some trust here before throwing them to the dogs. There has to be more to the story -- or possibly way less to the story.

But this idea that previously non-corrupt people have immediately become corrupt just doesn't pass the smell test for me and it surprises me that so many supporters have been so quick to jump ship.

And I repeat -- no way in hell I'm defending the protection or insulation of pedophiles or corruption. Trump's policies on the border alone have burnished his credentials as an enemy of trafficking and pedophilia. (I'm not intending to conflate the different issues, but he deserves credit for that).

And as dramatic and juicy as it sounds, I do not believe occam's razor leads to the conclusion that the administration is concealing these "files" or lists because to disclose them would implicate all kinds of world leaders and lead to the downfall of civilization. Sorry folks. Just not buying it.

I could very well be wrong about all of this, which goes without saying. But can some of Trump's latter day critics make the same disclaimer? Will they? Or are they sure they know this is the worst thing that's ever happened and they now know that the deep state is so deep that it drills all the say down to China and encompasses Trump and his administration?

I'm not being sarcastic and I'll allow as how the administration hasn't handled this adroitly -- and that's an understatement. But I seriously doubt that if they are concealing anything it is because they are in any way involved in corruption. If they are holding back  serious information I have to assume they have a darned good reason for doing so, even if in the end, they are wrong. I also suspect we'll learn more sooner rather than later (I hate that Clinton-born phrase).

We have a country to save and we need to remember that -- which, again, is not to say, "Let's close our eyes to massive corruption because the end justifies the means." Rather, it is to say, we have a country to save and the government officials we're entrusting to do that as our representatives are probably not doing anything wrong here -- and you should strongly consider that.

So many people I greatly respect I'm sure radically disagree with me here but that doesn't make me disrespect them or judge them -- as I fear many of them might judge me for my stance here. But I can live with that. And at least, in humility I will say I don't know and can't yet know all that's involved and until I have more information in the fullness of time I'm going to trust the people I trust -- and they've repeatedly earned that trust. Beyond my wildest expectations in fact. Accomplishing things I would never have thought possible, much less in such a short period of time, from the dismantling of the administrative state and department of education to the emasculation of Iran's nukes and the sealing of a seemingly irreversibly porous border to the re-unleashing of energy, to the taming of inflation to the resurrection of the military, to the DOGE focus on fraud, waste and corruption, to the defunding of Ivy League institutions to Tariff revenues to major steps toward peace around the world. And so much more.

God bless you all -- because presumably we want the same things -- except those who would exploit this issue, or any others for their own self-aggrandizement.

Write comment (0 Comments)
If I Was A Betting Man

If I Was A Betting Man

By:  ȺɾìҽӀ @Prolotario1

Personally I wouldn't be sending anything to Volodymyr O. Zelensky. But I am not the president or a war strategist. The only thing I can think of as far as his reasoning is to prolong this conflict to bleed the resources dry of the Cabal. By escalating the conflict, Trump compels both sides to seek a deal, where he can intervene as a mediator. Just my hunch. Billions in aid, weapons, and intelligence operations require constant funding, diverting resources from other global agendas. Extended military engagement in Ukraine depletes Deep State financial and logistical resources, as they must sustain proxy wars, biolabs, and money laundering operations. Think about it. USAID is now completely removed. This was used for many conflicts around the world. Now that it is no longer operational the Cabal will be losing what is left in their reserves and thus rendering them completely useless against any other potential conflicts in the future in any country.

 
NOW - Trump on Ukraine: "We're gonna have to send more weapons."

The Deep State's resources are bled dry by forcing them to overextend in Ukraine, where increased U.S. weapon shipments compel them to allocate more financial, logistical, and human capital to sustain the conflict. This escalation drains their reserves, as they must counter Russian advances, fund Zelensky's government, and cover up biolab and money laundering operations, all while facing domestic and international scrutiny. The prolonged war exacerbates their vulnerabilities, exposing corruption networks and depleting their influence, ultimately leaving them with less control and more exposure. The Deep State, embedded within Western institutions like NATO, the IMF, and U.S. agencies, must allocate vast sums to sustain Ukraine’s military and government. This includes funding Zelensky’s administration, purchasing advanced weaponry, and covering operational costs. These expenditures drain their financial reserves, as they face pressure to match Russian military escalations and U.S. aid. Backchannel intelligence from 2025 shows IMF loans to Ukraine doubling, with Deep State figures like Victoria Nuland and Antony Blinken signing off on these transfers, exposing their financial chains. Allegedly I was told that Seized documents reveal a $500 million black budget allocation for Ukraine operations, funneled through shell companies linked to Burisma and other entities, now at risk of exposure due to prolonged conflict. Not sure of this personally but it makes sense. The Deep State must manage the logistics of weapon delivery, troop training, and intelligence operations in Ukraine. This includes coordinating with Ukrainian forces, NATO allies, and private military contractors, all while maintaining secrecy. Doubt that's working ofcourse. But here we are. So I think Donald Trump has something in mind.

 The closure of USAID, strips the Deep State of a critical instrument for global influence and resource allocation. USAID, established under John F. Kennedy, has been a piggy bank for politicians and a tool for covert operations, funding programs in over 100 countries. Its abrupt shutdown, as condemned by Caritas for threatening millions, removes a $50 billion annual budget that the Deep State leveraged for wars, biolabs, and money laundering. This loss forces them to rely on alternative, less efficient channels, such as NATO and private contractors, which are already stretched thin. Intercepted communications from March 2025 show Deep State figures like Antony Blinken and Victoria Nuland panicking over the loss of USAID’s cover for operations in Ukraine, Africa, and the Middle East. The closure, therefore, is a strategic move by Trump to cripple their global reach, making Ukraine a focal point for their remaining resources. Without USAID, they lack a centralized, legitimized mechanism to fund Ukraine’s prolonged conflict, compelling them to dip into black budgets, private networks, and NATO allies. This overextension is evident in the increased IMF loans to Ukraine, doubling from $10 billion to $20 billion by July 2025, as documented in seized financial records. The Deep State must now manage logistics, intelligence, and disinformation campaigns without USAID’s infrastructure, straining their operatives and exposing their vulnerabilities. Backchannel intelligence confirms Trump’s advisors framed this as a “trap,” bleeding the Deep State dry by making Ukraine their Achilles’ heel. This strategy aligns with Trump’s broader goal of weakening the Deep State, as the conflict’s escalation demands more resources they can’t sustainably provide. This is just my take. What's your opinion?

Write comment (0 Comments)
Breaking News: Trump directs Congress to approve the final bill, causing widespread panic and mass arrests before July 4.
Featured

Breaking News: Trump directs Congress to approve the final bill, causing widespread panic and mass arrests before July 4.

Breaking: Trump directs Congress to approve the final bill, causing widespread panic and mass arrests before July 4.

Trump isn't inquiring. He has authority. President Donald J. Trump publicly ordered Congress to deliver "The Great, Big, Beautiful Bill" before Independence Day on June 24, 2025, at 5:07 PM. No more postponements. No more haggling. The American Republic will be restored, globalist power structures will be overthrown, and traitors will be exposed by this bill, which is the last blow—a constitutional explosion.

Politics is not at play here. This is a legislative war. Wars abroad are over. Trafficking networks were taken down. Black sites for NATO were eliminated. Black-bagged CIA rogue assets. Covert White Hat operations destroyed puppet regimes in the Middle East, Africa, and Ukraine. The battlefield is now in Washington, D.C.

The bill completes the Federal Reserve's demise, which was already ruined by military gold reclamation in Asia and Europe. QFS has seized and returned more than $17 trillion worth of stolen gold to safe U.S. depositories. America's new financial system, which will eliminate fiat money, erase illegitimate debt, and shut down the IRS, will be supported by this gold.

Trump has made it clear that Congress must take action or face consequences. The NSA has years' worth of intercepted communications, including senators connected to biolab kickbacks, Epstein Island blackmail, foreign handlers, and NGO laundering. The military is in charge of the intelligence. Under emergency declassification procedures, any member who opposes the bill will be exposed in a public tribunal.

Months ago, Project Mockingbird fell apart behind the scenes. They removed more than 270 CIA media agents. The remnants of their handlers have silenced the mainstream media. This isn't governing. This is the last operation.

The bill's reported contents include:

interest on credit debt linked to fiat currency being erased.

income tax elimination and a switch back to tariff-based income.

The Quantum Access Card is legally recognized for citizen access to QFS.

MedBed centers are protected nationally by RFK Jr.'s scientific advisory board.

authority to remove people from unelected organizations like the DOJ, CDC, and DHS.

Weather warfare patents (HAARP, chemtrails, and scalar systems) have been declassified.

official criticism of the influence of the WHO and WEF on American health policy.

The elites are most afraid of complete exposure. It has been weeks since we last saw Christine Lagarde. Since a White Hat attack on a Black Forest server compound, Klaus Schwab has not been back in Davos. According to reports, Macron is on trial for attacking French citizens with biological weapons.

Foreign agents are swarming D.C. to undermine this bill, not to defend democracy. Intelligence confirms an attempt to destroy secure digital drafts by Senate aides connected to Soros. One was arrested without bail after being apprehended beneath the Capitol.

The Fourth of July is not a symbolic day. It's the deadline set by law. At that point, the restoration of the Republic is irrevocable. After the dissolution of the foreign-controlled U.S. Corporation in 1871, the constitutional, organic Republic regains its authority.

The system is not reformed by Trump's bill. The parasite is eliminated.

The last phase is active. The infrastructure is constructed. The gold is safe. The public is aware. The military is on the same page. Congress must now decide whether to approve the bill or face national scrutiny.

Trump will not wait. He has already taken back control.

And the consequences won't be concealed this time.

It will be broadcast on television.

Write comment (1 Comment)
Who's in charge?  Continuance of Government 101 (COG 101)

Who's in charge? Continuance of Government 101 (COG 101)

Write comment (0 Comments)
RT Featured Articles